Primer Fields

-
It came in December 2012, and radically changed the way we should look at the Universe.

David LaPoint’s theory of Primer Fields, the bowl shaped magnetic fields associated with all/every matter, takes away the need of associating Dark Energy with the expansion of the Universe. It very easily even explains and rather practically presents the structure of the Universe. No convoluted theories which get over everyone’s heads, and just a very simple concept he has come up with, by thinking in a bit differently.

If one can view even this one video patiently, his eyes will light up. Important parts (time-slots) in the video, even to make oneself interested, are - 7:50 to 8:41,   19:42 to 24:42,   27:07 to 27:40, and   30:04 to 32:09. The last time slot gives the proof of the assumption he begins with, please listen to it.


So, Dark Energy prima facie required to reconcile the total energy in the Universe, is not the reason behind the expansion of the Universe, along with its structure. A great discovery, and I salute David LaPoint for thinking differently.
In my work I’ve mentioned about the qualitative nature of Dark Energy. Rather I began with the term Qualitative Material Energies, and used this term almost everywhere. Dark Energy, the mix pool of Qualitative Material Energies, as I portrayed it.

Nowhere in my work I associated Dark Energy with the cause of expansion of the Universe. Rather I called it as a qualitative energy, and even mentioned it to be the mix of energies from where the matter is formed, the qualitative mix of energies from where matter originated.


So, as unnecessary clutter around Dark Energy and its properties gets shed, time has even come to move towards Qualitative Material Energies, a better term for explaining the very nature of Dark Energy!

http://hmpathy.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Possible homeopathic medicine for Coronavirus

-
(Read on wordpress,  https://hmpathy.wordpress.com/2020/04/12/possible-homeopathic-medicine-for-coronavirus/ ) Today when the world is fighting with the deadly Coronavirus, I'm trying to put my thoughts on the possible homeopathic medicine for it, and after much deliberation over the past days, than in any hurry. Homeopaths are trying to find the medicine for it, and there even are possible thoughts or remedies, like by Manish Bhatia, in this article . We don't know which medicine would be right finally, though I think that the right medicine to combat Coronavirus should be Aconitum napellus . This medicine, if you would ask to homeopaths in general, is used for common cold, general influenza and even pneumonia, etc, which have a sudden onset . Though, very possibly, it won't be thought to be the possible remedy for Coronavirus. I however have seen that in majority of cases, where we feel that the onset of common cold, influenza, etc, is sudden, and try this remedy, are not
Read more

Three Successive 'Standard' Potencies

-
Image
What is the logic of using three potencies of a particular medicine on a person? Three successive potencies, the three successive 'standard' potencies! We would have seen it done on ourselves, any family person, or a friend, or would have heard of it. Why three potencies? Let’s ask some crude questions to ourselves, based on simple logic, that why three potencies, and see if we can arrive at any answer Do three successive 'standard' potencies act better? And give better solution of our health issues? If so, then how? Or is it that the homeopath is unaware of which potency to use? Or is it just a tradition that got started, and we don’t even know who started it, who propagated it, on which logic, but we still follow it, without being aware whether it’s right or not! Have we seen this rule written by Hahnemann, or by any other homeopath as per some new findings anywhere? No… then why we follow it? And why it’s used really a lot, and rather so blindly? Imagin
Read more

First Book

-
Image
I came with my book, my very first book , in 2010, expecting a great response, as if a blast would happen, and my book would be a super hit very soon. Though I didn't know that it had so many language errors, and was also coming with somewhat a poor sense of book writing. Despite good ideas thus, the book didn't gather much response, and even the ones who bought it, felt a sad taste in mouth, due to so many issues in language specifically. I put below some parts of my post, from Blogger, the one I wrote on book's release, on July 11, 2010 , along with requisite edits. I've found a grand new theory on homeopathy, that gives the true base of homeopathy itself, which despite the development of homeopathy, has still been an unsolved and mysterious matter. I also have discovered many new things in homeopathy, and they are part and parcel of this grand new theory, and without saying, are in the book too. The book answers all the unanswered and unexplained things in homeopathy
Read more